Abstract
Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) has undergone an explosive evolution since its inception as a rudimentary skill with limited technology and therapeutic options. Early techniques involved simple manual traction that frequently proved ineffective for chronically implanted leads, and carried a significant risk of myocardial avulsion, tamponade, and death. The morbidity and mortality associated with these early extraction techniques limited their application to use only in life-threatening situations, such as infection and sepsis. The past four decades, however, have witnessed significant advances in lead extraction technology, resulting in more efficacious techniques and tools, providing the skilled extractor with a well-equipped armamentarium. With the development of the discipline, we have witnessed a growth in the community of TLE experts coincident with a marked decline in the incidence of procedure-related morbidity and mortality, with recent registries at high-volume centers reporting high success rates with exceedingly low complication rates. Future developments in lead extraction are likely to focus on new tools that will allow for us to provide comprehensive device management, develop alternative systems for extraction training, and focus on the design of new leads conceived to facilitate future extraction.
Highlights
Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) has undergone an explosive evolution since its inception as a rudimentary skill with limited technology and therapeutic options
The expansion of indications for cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) therapy and an aging population have resulted in an exponential increase in CIED use
It is estimated that the demand for transvenous lead extraction (TLE) has
Summary
The expansion of indications for cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) therapy and an aging population have resulted in an exponential increase in CIED use. With this, observed complications have increased in a disproportionate manner[1,2] because of greater CIED utilization, more frequent device system revisions for complications,[3,4,5] system upgrade,[6,7,8] lead malfunction,[9,10,11,12,13] and longer patient life expectancies. This has mandated a paradigm shift towards premeditated lead management strategies—from implant to removal or replacement.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.