Strategies for the control of one-host ticks and relationship with tick-borne diseases in South America

Abstract

A variety of hemoparasites occurs in ruminants of South America (12°00′N–56°00′S), but there is consensus on the significant economic impact of babesiosis ( Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina) and anaplasmosis ( Anaplasma marginale). The tick vector for the Babesia spp. for the whole region is Boophilus microplus which has been the most important target in control/eradication programs. Boophilus microplus and many different hematophagous diptera species are considered vectors of A. marginale. In areas where babesiosis and anaplasmosis are present, the wide range of climates (tropical, subtropical, temperate), husbandry practices (subsistence, extensive, intensive), and tick control strategies has led to the concepts of enzootic stability and instability. Within this framework, six control strategies for Boophilus microplus can be identified: 1. (1) absolute tick control—with the establishment of quarantine areas and the implementation of state legislation; 2. (2) absolute tick control in marginal areas—using local epidemiological knowledge, strategic treatments, quarantine areas and the intervention of the state; 3. (3) prophylactic treatment—with a predetermined acaricide treatment schedule aimed at reducing tick burdens to an acceptably low level; 4. (4) threshold treatment—acaricides are applied by the farmer whenever the number of ticks on cattle exceed a threshold level; 5. (5) opportunistic treatment—acaricides are applied when cattle are assembled for other purposes; 6. (6) integrated tick control—principally involving the combination of acaricides with the use of tick-resistant crossbred cattle.