Strategies analysis for improving SWAT model accuracy and representativeness of calibrated parameters in sediment simulation for various land use and climate conditions

Abstract

Sediment yields in a watershed are usually affected by various natural disturbances and anthropogenic activities, and can be simulated by using hydrological models. However, due to the availability and type of data (i.e., continuous or discrete) of measured sediment data, model calibration and validation performances could be significantly affected and the calibrated parameters may not be representative for the area. In this study, the sediment rating curves (SRCs) were developed to increase measurements of sediments for model calibration, and five strategies of using measured and estimated sediment data on improving a hydrological model (Soil and Water Assessment Tool, SWAT) calibration and validation for multiple sediment stations were analyzed. The five strategies were: using measured sediment data (S1), using measured data and different portions of estimated sediment during typhoon events (S2 to S4), and using estimated sediment data during entire simulation period (S5). The results showed that although the S1 mostly performed better than other sediment strategies, S4 and S5 were also suitable for improving sediment simulation at the downstream stations (STN1, 2, and 3) and upstream station (STN4), respectively. Moreover, the impact of incorporating different portions of typhoon-induced sediment data (S2, S3, and S4) on the model performance showed differently at stations. In sum, the proposed analytical procedure is expected to be useful for calibrating sediment parameters of hydrological models with limited or highly unevenly distributed measured sediment data.