Abstract
BackgroundIn developing dairy sectors, genetic improvement programs have limited resources and recording of herds is minimal. This study evaluated different methods to estimate lactation yield and sampling schedules with fewer test-day records per lactation to determine recording regimes that (1) estimate lactation yield with a minimal impact on the accuracy of selection and (2) optimise the available resources.MethodsUsing Sahiwal cattle as a tropical dairy breed example, weekly milk records from 464 cows were used in a simulation study to generate different shaped lactation curves. The daily milk yields from these simulated lactation curves were subset to equally spaced (weekly, monthly and quarterly) and unequally spaced (with four, five or six records per lactation) test-day intervals. Lactation yield estimates were calculated from these subsets using two methods: the test-interval method and Wood’s (Nature 216:164-165, 1967) lactation curve model. Using the resulting lactation yields, breeding values were predicted and comparisons were made between the sampling regimes and estimation methods.ResultsThe results show that, based on the mean square error of prediction, use of Wood’s lactation curve model to estimate total yield was more accurate than use of the test-interval method. However, the differences in the ranking of animals were small, i.e. a 1 to 5% difference in accuracy. Comparisons between the different test-day sampling regimes showed that, with the same number of records per lactation (for example, quarterly and four test-days), strategically timed test-days can result in more accurate estimates of lactation yield than test-days at equal intervals.ConclusionsAn important outcome of these results is that combining Wood’s model for lactation yield estimation and as few as four, five or six strategically placed test-day records can produce estimates of lactation yield that are comparable with estimates based on monthly test-day records using the test-interval method. Furthermore, calculations show that although using fewer test-days results in a decrease in the accuracy of selection, it does provide an opportunity to progeny-test more sires. Thus, using strategically timed test-days and Wood’s model to estimate lactation yield, can lead to a more efficient use of the allocated resources.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12711-014-0078-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Highlights
In developing dairy sectors, genetic improvement programs have limited resources and recording of herds is minimal
We recently reported that the Wood model is more robust than others when fitting lactation curves to infrequent and irregular test-day sampling regimes (TDSR), which are common in developing country scenarios [23]
We can test the efficacy of this process by examining the trend of the median mean square error of prediction (MSEP) of all the TDSR tested within each loop (Figure 3)
Summary
Genetic improvement programs have limited resources and recording of herds is minimal. Breed improvement and selection in dairy systems of developing countries is a challenge because field conditions are restricted by limited resources and infrequent milk recording In these situations, frequent test-day (TD) recording throughout the entire lactation for genetic evaluation purposes is difficult and impractical [1]. We recently reported that the Wood model is more robust than others when fitting lactation curves to infrequent and irregular test-day sampling regimes (TDSR), which are common in developing country scenarios [23] For these reasons, the Wood model was used for data modelling and simulation of datasets for this study, it is expected that other models of similar complexity would give similar results
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
