Abstract

Firms devising green investment strategies within a deregulated environment must take into account not only economic and technological uncertainty, but also strategic interactions due to competition. Also, further complicating green investment decisions is the fact that firms are likely to exhibit risk aversion, since alternative energy technologies entail risk that cannot be diversified. Therefore, we develop a utility-based, real options framework for pre-emptive and non-pre-emptive competition in order to analyse how economic and technological uncertainty interact with risk aversion to impact the adoption of an existing technology in the light of uncertainty over the arrival of an improved version. We confirm that greater risk aversion delays investment and show that technological uncertainty accelerates the follower’s entry, delays the entry of the pre-emptive leader, and, intriguingly, does not affect the non-pre-emptive leader’s investment decision. Also, we show how the relative loss in the leader’s value due to the follower’s entry is affected by economic and technological uncertainty as well as risk aversion, and how the risk of pre-emption under increasing economic uncertainty raises the value of direct investment in the new technology relative to stepwise investment.

Highlights

  • In the light of pressing climate change concerns, stringent environmental regulations and the growing demand for energy-efficient technologies have incentivised private firms to switch to green energy technologies and intensify research and development (R&D) activities

  • We relax the assumption of risk neutrality, and, we analyse how risk aversion interacts with price and technological uncertainty to affect the technology adoption strategy of each firm

  • We analyse how risk aversion interacts with price and technological uncertainty to impact sequential green investment decisions under duopolistic competition

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the light of pressing climate change concerns, stringent environmental regulations and the growing demand for energy-efficient technologies have incentivised private firms to switch to green energy technologies and intensify research and development (R&D) activities. In the area of electric vehicles, technology pioneer Tesla Motors announced in 2014 that it would make several hundreds of approved patents available to competitors at no cost (The Wall Street Journal, 2014) This is expected to accelerate innovation, increase the market of electric vehicles relative to those based on fossil fuel and promote a more competitive environment, whereby firms may take advantage of other firms’ patented technologies. We consider a stylised duopolistic competition, where two identical firms compete in the sequential adoption of green energy technologies facing price and technological uncertainty Within this context, we analyse the case of nonpre-emptive (proprietary) and pre-emptive (non-proprietary) competition. We develop a utility-based framework in order to analyse how price and technological uncertainty interact with risk aversion to impact sequential investment decisions under duopolistic competition.

Related work
Assumptions and notation
Benchmark case
Non-pre-emptive duopoly
E 2 d 2 dE 2
Pre-emptive duopoly
Leapfrog strategy
Numerical examples
Conclusions
Compulsive strategy
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call