Abstract
Live streaming as a new shopping channel can disclose revealing information on quality preference. With this channel, viewers can obtain additional product details along with entertainment utility from streamers' product showcasing. This paper examines live streaming strategies for vertically differentiated firms that sell products of high or low quality. We obtain the optimal pricing strategies for the high-quality, low-quality firms under a particular live streaming strategy (i.e., (N,N); (S,N); (N,S); (S,S)). We identify how the competing firms should set their live streaming strategies. As the entertainment value increases, firms with a competitive edge are more willing to adopt live streaming. If the “quality-adjusted cost” is lower than 12, then the high-quality firm is prone to adopt live streaming; otherwise, the low-quality firm is prone to adopt live streaming. The entertainment value greatly influences the adoption decision. When the streamer is more popular and charges a medium fixed cost, the competitive firm (i.e., small marginal cost, high quality) should adopt live streaming to expand its marketplace. The other firm should refuse live streaming and emphasize improving its product quality and competitiveness. Interestingly, live streaming is not always beneficial to firms when the competitive advantages dominate the impact of live streaming and the informative degree is improved little.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
