Abstract
AbstractThe literature tends to present an essentialized view of the Indian movement in Ecuador. This article identifies two distinct strands of the Ecuadorian Indian movement(s). The “indigenous” strand, which primarily constructs an “ethnic” (indigenous) identity, is usually taken to embody the whole Indian movement. This belies the existence of a “campesino-indigenous” strand that has witnessed a significant shift from an original emphasis on “class” to the current construction of a dual “class”—and “ethnicity” -based identity. A heterogeneity of orientations within the Indian movement(s) is supported by research in Imbabura province. Interviews with the leaders of both strands and some Quichua campesinos were conducted immediately following a national Indian uprising in June 1994 which paralyzed the country for nine days. Curiously, it was also an uprising in which the indigenous people of Imbabura did not participate. Their non-participation can be linked to the interaction between the two strands.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Canadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.