Strain prediction and benchmark with measurement in the Spallation Neutron Source mercury target without gas injection

Abstract

The 1.4-MW Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) currently operates as the world's highest time-average power spallation source and uses mercury as the spallation target material. The mercury circulates through a stainless-steel target vessel and heat exchanger loop that removes the heat deposited from the incident proton beam in the target. The mercury vessel is part of the fixed but replaceable target module. The target module is not safety credited in the SNS design, but reliable long life is vital for meeting operational goals and minimizing cost and waste. SNS is a short-pulse ($\ensuremath{\sim}0.7\text{ }\text{ }\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{s}$) neutron source with a repetition rate of 60 Hz with 1.0 GeV protons onto the target. The short-pulse operation introduces two mechanisms that threaten the longevity of the mercury vessel. The pulsed target heating is essentially isochoric, which results in a distributed pressure field in the mercury with each pulse. After each pulse, the pressure propagates, interacts with, and strains the stainless-steel vessel. For intermittent times, this pressure field leads to mercury cavitation. The first mechanism of concern for the target lifetime is high-cycle fatigue to the stainless-steel vessel and the second is cavitation erosion. At the onset of the SNS project, the R program sought to address the need for an accurate and practical method to estimate the fatigue life of the mercury vessel. Around 2000, the R team conducted a series of in-beam mercury target experiments at the Weapons Neutron Research Facility at Los Alamos Neutron Science Center. These experiments successfully produced a small database of pulse response strain data. The data were used to develop and benchmark an explicit dynamic finite element analysis technique for estimating target fatigue life. SNS is now a mature facility with about 15 years of operation and 29 SNS target modules consumed. Since 2015, strain measurements have been collected from actual targets, and abundant target vessel strain data are now available in greater detail than was possible in 2000. Variances in pulse response data have been characterized using tolerance interval analysis to benchmark the simulation technique more thoroughly. The simulated results were found to match measurements generally well, but the method is always conservative. A potential adjustment to the cavitation threshold parameter value was suggested. Variances in the pulse response data are moderate, which is largely explained by the fact that data were acquired in 60-Hz burst mode and by the lasting vibration of the vessel between pulses.