Storytelling of Myocarditis.

Abstract

In 1900, Fiedler first reported autopsy cases with peculiar inflammation of the myocardium, which he named interstitial myocarditis. He postulated an isolated cardiac inflammation of the myocardium in the absence of multiorgan involvement and with a poor prognosis due to invisible microorganisms, which years later would have been identified as viruses. The revision of original histologic sections by Schmorl showed cases with lymphocytes and others with giant-cell inflammatory histotypes. The in vivo diagnosis of myocarditis became possible thanks to right cardiac catheterization with endomyocardial biopsy (EMB). The gold standard for diagnosis was achieved with the employment of immunohistochemistry and molecular investigation by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), which allows for the detection of viruses as causal agents. Both RNA and DNA were revealed to be cardiotropic, with a common receptor (CAR). A protease, coded by coxsackie virus, disrupts the cytoskeleton and accounts for cell death. Unfortunately, vaccination, despite having been revealed to be effective in animal experiments, has not yet entered the clinical field for prevention. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance turned out to be a revolutionary tool for in vivo diagnosis through the detection of edema (inflammatory exudate). Myocarditis may be fulminant in terms of clinical presentation but not necessarily fatal. The application of ExtraCorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) allows for relieving the overloaded native heart.