Abstract

This study compares the amount, distribution, and stability of soil organic carbon (SOC) in six paired quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx) and conifer plots at three locations in northern Utah, to assess the influence of vegetation cover and other biotic and abiotic drivers on SOC storage capacity in seasonally dry environments. Aspen soils accumulated significantly more SOC in the mineral soil (0–60 cm) (92.2 ± 26.7 Mg C ha−1 vs. 66.9 ± 18.6 Mg C ha−1 under conifers), and despite thicker O horizons under conifers that contained higher amounts of SOC (11.6 ± 8.8 Mg C ha−1 under conifers vs. 1.65 ± 0.38 Mg C ha−1 in aspen), across all sites SOC storage was 25% higher under aspen. Shallow soil cores (0–15 cm) did not indicate significant differences in SOC with vegetation type. The SOC under aspen was also more stable, indicated by well‐developed mollic epipedon (A horizon 38–53‐cm thick vs. 5.5–34 cm under conifers), slower turnover of surficial SOC deduced from long‐term laboratory incubations (67.7 ± 15.7 g CO2–C per kg C for aspen vs. 130.9 ± 41.3 g CO2–C per kg C for conifer soils), and a greater preponderance of mineral‐associated SOC (55±13% in aspen vs. 41±13% in conifer). Aspen soils were generally wetter and we hypothesize that rapid litter turnover coupled with greater water supply may have caused greater downward redistribution and adsorption of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in aspen soils.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.