Abstract

IntroductionPregnant women can experience barriers and facilitators towards achieving smoking cessation. We sought consensus from smoking cessation practitioners on how influential pre-identified barriers and facilitators can be on pregnant women's smoking behaviour, and how difficult these might be to manage. Suggestions for techniques that could help overcome the barriers or enhance the facilitators were elicited and consensus sought on the appropriateness for their use in practice. MethodsForty-four practitioners who provided cessation support to pregnant women completed a three-round modified Delphi survey. Round one sought consensus on the ‘influence’ and ‘difficulty’ of the barriers and facilitators, and gathered respondents' suggestions on ways to address these. Rounds two and three sought further consensus on the barriers and facilitators and on ‘appropriateness’ of the respondent-suggested techniques. The techniques were coded for behaviour change techniques (BCTs) content using existing taxonomies. ResultsBarriers and facilitators considered to be the most important mainly related to the influence of significant others and the women's motivation & self-efficacy. Having a supportive partner was considered the most influential, whereas lack of support from partner was the only barrier that reached consensus as being difficult to manage. Barriers relating to social norms were also considered influential, however these received poor coverage of respondent-suggested techniques. Those considered the easiest to address mainly related to aspects of cessation support, including misconceptions surrounding the use of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT). Barriers and facilitators relating to the women's motivation & self-efficacy, such as the want to protect the baby, were also considered as being particularly easy to address. Fifty of the 54 respondent-suggested techniques reached consensus as being appropriate. Those considered the most appropriate ranged from providing support early, giving correct information on NRT, highlighting risks and benefits and reinforcing motivating beliefs. Thirty-three BCTs were identified from the respondent-suggested techniques. ‘Social support (unspecified)’, ‘Tailor interactions appropriately’ and ‘Problem solving’ were the most frequently coded BCTs. ConclusionsInvolving partners in quit attempts was advocated. Existing support could be potentially improved by establishing appropriate ways to address barriers relating to pregnant smokers' ‘social norms’. In general, providing consistent and motivating support seemed favourable.

Highlights

  • Pregnant women can experience barriers and facilitators towards achieving smoking cessation

  • The overall prevalence rates in the country have dropped from 15.8% in 2006/07 (NHS Digital, 2018b), only 31 of 195 areas in England have, to date, met the 6% or below target (NHS Digital, 2018b)

  • This study aimed to develop consensus on the pre-identified barriers and facilitators (Campbell et al, 2018; Flemming et al, 2015), amongst practitioners with experience in providing cessation support to pregnant women, on: a) how influential these barriers and facilitators can be on women's smoking behaviour, and b) how easy or difficult it might be for practitioners to help the women overcome barriers or enhance facilitators

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pregnant women can experience barriers and facilitators towards achieving smoking cessation. Barriers relating to social norms were considered influential, these received poor coverage of respondent-suggested techniques Those considered the easiest to address mainly related to aspects of cessation support, including misconceptions surrounding the use of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT). Areas to have achieved this target are mainly in Southern parts of the country (NHS Digital, 2018b) where levels of deprivation are relatively low (Department for Communities and Local Government, 2015), whereas areas that have not are mainly around Northern England and the Midlands (NHS Digital, 2018b) where levels of deprivation and prevalence of smoking are relatively high (Department for Communities and Local Government, 2015). Examples of this include London and the surrounding areas having prevalence rates of between 2.3% and 2.7%, whereas districts in and around Blackpool and North Nottinghamshire have prevalence rates of between 23.2% and 24.9% (NHS Digital, 2018b)

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call