Abstract

In this paper we derive and test a relation between current-period unexpected returns and unexpected earnings that incorporates revisions in forecasts of future earnings. Our motivation is to emphasize the misspecification in returns/earnings regressions that omit information currently available about future earnings and offer a solution. Since changes in expectations of future earnings are related strongly to unexpected returns, those regressions have low explanatory power. More important, coefficient estimates are biased because the omitted and included variables are correlated, and explanatory power is even lower when that correlation varies within the sample. The relation we derive extends the simple regression of unexpected returns on unexpected earnings, often used in studies examining the value relevance of accounting earnings (beginning with Ball and Brown [1968]), to a multiple regression. The additional regressors, which reflect information contained in forecast revisions and discount rate changes occurring during the year, are identified using the abnormal earnings valuation model.' Relative to the simple regression, the multiple regression improves explanatory power significantly (R2 values increase from

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.