Abstract

Europe continues to lag behind the USA in venture capital (VC) activity and in the creation of successful startups, and has recently been surpassed by China. This is despite the fact that many European countries have deep financial markets, strong legal institutions, and high R&D spending. We point to the tax treatment of employee stock options as an explanation for the stronger growth of the US VC sector. As a response to high uncertainty and transaction costs, VC financiers have developed a model in which founders and key recruitments are compensated with stock options under complex contracts. Low tax rates on employee stock options further raise the relative returns of working and investing in innovative entrepreneurial firms, and shift financial capital and talent to that sector. We measure the effective tax on stock options in VC-backed entrepreneurial firms in a number of developed economies. Countries with lower stock option taxation have higher VC activity and more high-growth expectation entrepreneurial activity. Based on these associations and the theoretical and empirical literature, we argue that more lenient taxation of gains on employee stock options can be a strategy for European countries to catch up in entrepreneurial finance. This tax policy would narrowly target entrepreneurial startups without requiring broad tax cuts. The favorable tax treatment of stock options allows the state to promote firms that rely on entrepreneurial finance and make use of these types of contracts without lowering taxes for other sectors of the economy.

Highlights

  • Financing firm creation and expansion is a first-order problem in entrepreneurial venturing

  • Why are stock options not used to the same extent in venture capital (VC)-backed ventures in Europe? Could there be factors that discourage the use of stock options in compensation contracts which result in the smaller VC sectors compared to those in the USA? This paper argues that the tax treatment of employee stock options is a major factor explaining cross-country differences in the VC sector size

  • Because stock options are advantageous in the VC sector, the favorable tax treatment has led to widespread use and a low effective taxation of VC-funded entrepreneurship as a whole

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Financing firm creation and expansion is a first-order problem in entrepreneurial venturing. Because stock options are advantageous in the VC sector, the favorable tax treatment has led to widespread use and a low effective taxation of VC-funded entrepreneurship as a whole This helps explain the more common use of stock options and the high VC activity in the USA compared to that in other industrialized countries. More lenient taxation of gains from employee stock options may be a useful tool to achieve the policy goals of promoting entrepreneurship and the VC sector Lowering these tax rates would narrowly target firms in the entrepreneurial sector that are able to attract VC, while broad tax cuts are associated with large revenue losses and increasing inequality.

The use of stock options in innovation finance
Regression results
The sample consists of the following 33 countries
Findings
Discussion and conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call