Abstract

The price-to-earnings ratio effect and the small firm effect literature suggests that stock markets are inefficient, asset pricing models are misspecified, or both. Consequently, it appears that one can earn positive, abnormal, risk-adjusted returns by investing in select stocks based on P/E ratio, firm size, or other anomalous behavior criteria. One potential explanation for the abnormal return observations is survivor bias in tests of asset pricing models. This research reports the results of an empirical investigation of delisting as a possible contributor to anomalous behaviors. The evidence indicates that delisting fails to contribute to the P/E effect; however, firm size is associated with delisting when survivor bias is controlled.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.