Abstract
Using a sample of UK mergers and acquisitions from 1985-2004, we show that equity over-valuation appears to play an important role in the determination of financing method. Our results are broadly consistent with the Sheifer and Vishny (2003) theory of market-driven acquisitions rather than a Q-theory explanation. In some contrast to the US results of Dong et al (2006) we find that over-valuation appears to be the more persuasive explanation for acquisition behaviour in the UK, although like them we cannot comprehensively reject a Q-theory explanation. Given the evidence in favour of the Shleifer-Vishny hypothesis, we argue that a selection model is necessary in when investigate the long run performance of acquirers, and present results which indicate that there is some evidence of high-Q acquirers performing better, but only amongst the cash acquirer sub-sample.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
