Abstract

Background: The approximate 5:1 male to female ratio in clinical detection of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) prevents research from characterizing the female phenotype. Current open access repositories [such as those in the Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange (ABIDE I-II)] contain large numbers of females to help begin providing a new characterization of females on the autistic spectrum. Here we introduce new methods to integrate data in a scale-free manner from continuous biophysical rhythms of the nervous systems and discrete (ordinal) observational scores.Methods: New data-types derived from image-based involuntary head motions and personalized statistical platform were combined with a data-driven approach to unveil sub-groups within the female cohort. Further, to help refine the clinical DSM-based ASD vs. Asperger's Syndrome (AS) criteria, distributional analyses of ordinal score data from Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS)-based criteria were used on both the female and male phenotypes.Results: Separate clusters were automatically uncovered in the female cohort corresponding to differential levels of severity. Specifically, the AS-subgroup emerged as the most severely affected with an excess level of noise and randomness in the involuntary head micro-movements. Extending the methods to characterize males of ABIDE revealed ASD-males to be more affected than AS-males. A thorough study of ADOS-2 and ADOS-G scores provided confounding results regarding the ASD vs. AS male comparison, whereby the ADOS-2 rendered the AS-phenotype worse off than the ASD-phenotype, while ADOS-G flipped the results. Females with AS scored higher on severity than ASD-females in all ADOS test versions and their scores provided evidence for significantly higher severity than males. However, the statistical landscapes underlying female and male scores appeared disparate. As such, further interpretation of the ADOS data seems problematic, rather suggesting the critical need to develop an entirely new metric to measure social behavior in females.Conclusions: According to the outcome of objective, data-driven analyses and subjective clinical observation, these results support the proposition that the female phenotype is different. Consequently the “social behavioral male ruler” will continue to mask the female autistic phenotype. It is our proposition that new observational behavioral tests ought to contain normative scales, be statistically sound and combined with objective data-driven approaches to better characterize the females across the human lifespan.

Highlights

  • Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) presents a diagnosis ratio estimated between 4:1 and 5:1 males to females (Volkmar et al, 1993; Mandy et al, 2012), a figure that is further exacerbated by evidence indicating that females are diagnosed significantly later than males (Lai et al, 2015)

  • The pattern of separation between the ASD and Asperger’s Syndrome (AS) groups of females is reflected in a distinct unsupervised separation of groups in relation to Objective Female Autistic Phenotype underlying stochastic signature of the physiological signature. These results suggest that an increase in somaticmotor noise in AS females distinguishes this group from the ASD group—a distinction reflected in the clinical tool assessment

  • Building on prior work quantifying differences in patterns of voluntary control that differentiate between males and females with ASD (Torres et al, 2013b) during a decision-making task, the present results demonstrate the ability to detect sex differences by analyzing involuntary head motion extracted from resting state activity during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiments

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) presents a diagnosis ratio estimated between 4:1 and 5:1 males to females (Volkmar et al, 1993; Mandy et al, 2012), a figure that is further exacerbated by evidence indicating that females are diagnosed significantly later than males (Lai et al, 2015). Studies show that observational clinical tools, such as the Diagnostic Statistical Manual (DSM) [ASD; APA 4] and Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) (Lord et al, 2000, 2012) may need modifications to detect symptomatology earlier in females. Such adaptations could help further our understanding of differential sex contribution to the ASD phenotype. The current methods are grounded on the observation of social behaviors within the male phenotype. The approximate 5:1 male to female ratio in clinical detection of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) prevents research from characterizing the female phenotype. We introduce new methods to integrate data in a scale-free manner from continuous biophysical rhythms of the nervous systems and discrete (ordinal) observational scores

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.