Abstract

Molecular collisions with very small particles induce Brownian motion. Consequently, such particles exhibit classical diffusion during their sedimentation. However, identical particles too large to be affected by Brownian motion also change their relative positions. This phenomenon is called hydrodynamic diffusion. Long before this term was coined, the variability of individual particle trajectories had been recognized and a stochastic model had been formulated. In general, stochastic and diffusion approaches are formally equivalent. The convective and diffusive terms in a diffusion equation correspond formally to the drift and diffusion terms of a Fokker–Planck equation (FPE). This FPE can be cast in the form of a stochastic differential equation (SDE) that is much easier to solve numerically. The solution of the associated SDE, via a large number of stochastic paths, yields the solution of the original equation. The three-parameter Markov model, formulated a decade before hydrodynamic diffusion became fashionable, describes one-dimensional sedimentation as a simple SDE for the velocity process { V( t)}. It predicts correctly that the steady-state distribution of particle velocities is Gaussian and that the autocorrelation of velocities decays exponentially. The corresponding position process { X( t)} is not Markov, but the bivariate process {X(t), V(t)} is both Gaussian and Markov. The SDE pair yields continuous velocities and sample paths. The other approach does not use the diffusion process corresponding to the FPE for the three-parameter model; rather, it uses an analogy to Fickian diffusion of molecules. By focusing on velocity rather than position, the stochastic model has several advantages. It subsumes Kynch’s theory as a first approximation, but corresponds to the reality that particle velocities are, in fact, continuous. It also profits from powerful theorems about stochastic processes in general and Markov processes in particular. It allows transient phenomena to be modeled by using parameters determined from the steady-state. It is very simple and efficient to simulate, but the three parameters must be determined experimentally or computationally. Relevant data are still sparse, but recent experimental and computational work is beginning to determine values of the three parameters and even the additional two parameters needed to simulate three-dimensional motion. If the dependence of the parameters on solids concentration is known, this model can simulate the sedimentation of the entire slurry, including the packed bed and the slurry–supernate interface. Simulations using half a million particles are already feasible with a desktop computer.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call