Abstract

Previous studies mostly investigate player's cooperative behavior as affected by game time-scale or individual diversity. In this paper, by involving both time-scale and diversity simultaneously, we explore the effect of stochastic heterogeneous interaction. In our model, the occurrence of game interaction between each pair of linked player obeys a random probability, which is further described by certain distributions. Simulations on a 4-neighbor square lattice show that the cooperation level is remarkably promoted when stochastic heterogeneous interaction is considered. The results are then explained by investigating the mean payoffs, the mean boundary payoffs and the transition probabilities between cooperators and defectors. We also show some typical snapshots and evolution time series of the system. Finally, the 8-neighbor square lattice and BA scale-free network results indicate that the stochastic heterogeneous interaction can be robust against different network topologies. Our work may sharpen the understanding of the joint effect of game time-scale and individual diversity on spatial games.

Highlights

  • Cooperation is ubiquitous in nature and it plays an important role in the evolution of species [1,2,3,4,5]

  • Understanding the emergence and persistence of cooperative behavior among selfish individuals remains an open and challenging problem [6], which has been widely studied by biologists, physicists and sociologists over the years [7]

  • We focus the highlight on intermittent gaming, adopting the relative simple partner selection rule depicted in

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cooperation is ubiquitous in nature and it plays an important role in the evolution of species [1,2,3,4,5]. In the original PDG, two players simultaneously choose to either cooperate (C) or defect (D). They will both get a payoff R (P) if they are both cooperators (defectors). It is obvious that mutual cooperation can get a lager payoff than mutual defection, and there is a conflict of interest between what is best for the individual and what is best for the group. This is the so called ‘‘social dilemma’’

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.