Abstract

To establish differences between the frequency of suspected deprivation myopia in unilateral and bilateral congenital ptosis with and without covered optical axis. Ametropia was evaluated in both eyes of 95 patients with congenital ptosis. The amount of refraction was documented as spherical equivalent (100% cycloplegia). Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square and sign tests. In unilateral ptosis, the frequency of myopia was lower (10/68: 15%) than that of hyperopia (58/68: 85%) in the ptotic eye (P <0.001). However, myopia occurred more often in the ptotic eye (10/68: 15%) than in the fellow eye (3/68: 4.4%). Myopic anisometropia was found only in the ptotic eye (5/68 vs 0/68), but was less frequent than hyperopic anisometropia (6/68 vs 8/68). In bilateral ptosis 7/54 myopia as compared with 47/54 hyperopia were observed and 1/27 myopic anisometropia vs 6/27 hyperopic anisometropia. Covered center of the pupil, in children < or = 8 years of age, was associated with myopia more frequently in bilateral than in unilateral ptosis (6/30 vs 1/27). We found a significantly higher rate of myopia <-1 diopter and hyperopia >2 diopter in comparison of children 5 to 7 years old with first-grade school children. Two expected results were (1) compared with the normal population, an overall higher frequency of myopia in human congenital ptosis; (2) in unilateral ptosis, a higher frequency of myopia in the ptotic, than in the fellow eye.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.