Abstract
The controversy on inhibition in operant discriminations is examined in the light of Konorski’s models. Errorless learning apparently leads to “pure” drive inhibition by S-s. Nonreception of anticipated rewards during learning with errors can provoke both drive enhancement, and drive and response inhibition by S-s sharing some of the excitatory properties of S+s. These differences, rather than inhibitory phenomena per se, can explain contrast, peak shift, and U-shaped gradients of inhibition after learning with errors.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
