Abstract
After paired-associate learning to one of three degrees of learning with compound stimuli, the stimulus components were presented in isolation and S required to respond with the other components and the response. Response recall failure precluded recall of other components. This result was shown not traceable to a small number of such events, to item selection, or to the possibility that S forms intercomponent associations only after forming component-response associations. When the response was recalled, recalls of other components were frequent but stochastically independent of each other. Nevertheless, standard stimulus selection phenomena occurred. These analyses deny the general assumption that stimulus components become interassociated during paired-associate learning.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
