Abstract
The classical procedure for demonstrating the reinforcing properties of stimulus-change for rats confounds the response-contingent change with the production of dim illumination. This experiment unconfounded the two by providing a response-contingent visual change without a change in the ambient illumination. This “pure” visual change was not reinforcing, whereas a response-contingent change from darkness to dim illumination—the classical procedure—was unambiguously reinforcing. Thus much research purporting to demonstrate reinforcement in rats by “visual change” can be reinterpreted as demonstrating that dim illumination is preferred over darkness.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
