Abstract
This study presents results of an investigation into the effects of monetary reward, survey sponsorship, and type of appeal on overall response rate and response completeness in surveys of business professionals. It is concluded that: (1) as in surveys of the general public, university sponsorship is more effective than commercial sponsorship, (2) a help-the-sponsor appeal is significantly more effective than other appeals under university sponsorship but significantly less effective under commercial sponsorship, and (3) monetary rewards enhance response rates when used in conjunction with ego or social utility appeals but disenhance response rates when used in conjunction with a help-the-sponsor appeal. Thus, important interactions among these three response-inducing techniques are found and discussed. Finally, it is concluded that these effects do not extend to response completeness.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
