Abstract
Theory argues that Social Democratic parties strive for more universal welfare benefits. However, this paper argues that universal welfare benefits are also attractive to right-wing parties because of their market conformity. Further, Social Democratic and other left-wing parties may argue against universal benefits based on arguments about redistribution. The weakness of the universal welfare model is thus that its redistributional effects are counter-intuitive. The argument of the article is supported by the development of universalism in the Danish welfare state during the last decades. Moves away from universalism have mostly been taken by Social Democratic governments, and moves towards universalism have mostly been taken by right-wing governments.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
