Steroid avoidance using sirolimus and cyclosporine in pediatric renal transplantation: One year analysis

Abstract

Steroids are commonly used in pediatric renal transplantation, but have numerous adverse effects. This retrospective study compares one-yr outcomes in 22 pediatric renal transplant recipients receiving SRL and CSA as primary immunosuppression (steroid-avoidance group) to age- and gender-matched historical controls receiving CSA, MMF, and prednisone (steroid group). At one yr, both groups had similar graft survival, acute rejection, and estimated GFR. Subjects in the steroid-avoidance group had better linear growth, less excessive weight gain and were less likely to have an increase in antihypertensive medication use. Subjects in the steroid-avoidance group were more likely to be started on lipid lowering medications and erythropoiesis stimulating agents. Despite having a greater proportion of living donors, the steroid-avoidance group had a similar GFR compared to the steroid group at one month. The steroid-avoidance group was also more likely to have a biopsy for elevated Cr that was not because of rejection and had more interstitial fibrosis noted. We conclude that using a steroid-avoidance immunosuppression regimen of SRL and CSA results in comparable rejection rates and short-term graft function with less steroid-associated morbidity. However, early findings also suggest possible potentiation of CSA nephrotoxicity by SRL in some children.