Abstract

Background: Steroid induced clinical worsening in patients with spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (SDAVFs) has previously been reported in some case reports. However, it is not clear whether steroid administration also affects postoperative outcome. Objective: We conducted a prospective cohort study to identify the association between steroids and clinical worsening and compare outcomes between patients with and without preoperative steroid administration. Methods: Patients with angiographically-confirmed SDAVFs were recruited consecutively between March 2013 and December 2014 in two referral centers. We reviewed the history of all the patients to identify those patients who were treated with steroids prior to exclusion of the fistulas. Modified Aminoff & Logue's scale (mALS) was used to evaluate the spinal cord function at different time points: before and after steroid administration, before operation and at 1-year follow-up. Paired t tests were used to assess the mALS of patients with steroid administration at different time points. Unpaired t tests and Pearson chi-square test were used to assess differences between patients with and without steroid administration. Results: 18 patients with (18.2%) and 81 patients without (81.8%) steroid administration were included in this study. At baseline, there were no difference between both patient groups, in regards to age, gender, duration, location of fistula, treatment and preoperative mALS. However, patients without steroid administration had statistically significant better outcome according to their mALS at 1-year follow-up (P<0.05). Conclusion: Steroid administration can induce acute clinical worsening in patients with SDAVFs that may persist despite successful obliteration of the fistula and should thus be avoided. Funding: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Award Number: 81171165;81671202); Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission (Award Number: D161100003816001). Declaration of Interest: None declared. Ethical Approval: This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committees at each site. Informed consent was obtained from each patient.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call