Stereotactic body radiotherapy is an alternative to radiofrequency ablation for single HCC ≤5.0 cm

Abstract

Background & AimsRadiation therapy has been refined with the increasing evidence of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether SBRT could serve as an alternative to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for small HCC with a single lesion ≤ 5.0 cm. MethodsPatients with a single HCC lesion ≤ 5.0 cm who received RFA or SBRT were included. Cumulative local/distant recurrence rate (CLRR/CDRR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), adverse events (AEs) and subsequent treatments after recurrence were analyzed. ResultsA total of 288 patients received RFA (166) or SBRT (122) were enrolled. The baseline characteristics between the two groups were comparable. The CLRR in the SBRT group was significantly lower than that in the RFA group (HR = 0.30, 95%CI = 0.16 – 0.57, P < 0.001), especially for patients with tumors > 2.0 cm (HR = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.08 – 0.50, P < 0.001) or adjacent to major vessels (HR = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.13 – 0.66, P < 0.001). CDRR, PFS and OS showed no significant differences between the two groups (all P > 0.050). AEs were mild and easily reversible. However, more patients in the SBRT group suffered from Child-Pugh score and TB increase. More treatment options after recurrence or progression might be available for patients in the RFA group compared to those in the SBRT group (P < 0.001). ConclusionsBoth RFA and SBRT were effective and safe for HCC with a single lesion ≤ 5.0 cm. SBRT could be an alternative treatment to RFA, especially for tumors > 2.0 cm or adjacent to major vessels. Impact and implicationsStereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) may be used as an alternative therapy to thermal ablation for patients with BCLC stage A hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are not candidates for surgical resection, including those with tumors > 3 cm and those with 1 to 3 tumors. This study focused on HCC patients with specific tumor burden, a single lesion ≤ 5.0 cm, demonstrating that SBRT could be an effective and safe alternative to radiofrequency ablation (RFA), especially for those with tumors > 2.0 cm or adjacent to major vessels. The findings of this study provided robust empirical evidence supporting for the utilization of SBRT in treating small HCC, while also establishing a solid foundation for future prospective clinical investigations.