Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Sacral Metastases: Deviation From Recommended Target Volume Delineation Increases the Risk of Local Failure

Abstract

PurposeAlthough spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is considered a standard of care in the mobile spine, mature evidence reporting outcomes specific to sacral metastases is lacking. Furthermore, there is a need to validate the existing sacral SBRT international consensus contouring guidelines to define the optimal contouring approach. We report mature rates of local failure (LF), adverse events, and the impact of contouring deviations in the largest experience to date specific to sacrum SBRT. Methods/MaterialsConsecutive patients who underwent sacral SBRT from 2010-2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Primary endpoint was magnetic resonance imaging-based LF with a specific focus on adherence to target volume contouring recommendations. Secondary endpoints included vertebral compression fracture (VCF) and neural toxicity. ResultsOf the 215 sacrum segments treated in 112 patients, most received 30 Gy/4 fractions (51%), 24 Gy/2 fractions (31%), or 30 Gy/5 fractions (10%). Sixteen percent of segments were non-adherent to the consensus guideline with a more restricted target volume (under-contoured). The median follow-up was 21.4 months (range, 1.5-116.9). The cumulative incidence of LF at 1 and 2 years was 18.4% and 23.1%, respectively. In those with guideline adherent vs. non-adherent contours, the LF rate at 1 year was 15.1% vs. 31.4% and at 2 years 18.8% vs. 40.0% (HR=2.5, 95% CI 1.4-4.6, p=0.003), respectively. On multivariable analysis, guideline non-adherence (HR=2.4, 95% CI 1.3-4.7, p=0.008), radioresistant histology (HR=2.4, 95% CI 1.4-4.1, p<0.001), and extraosseous extension (HR=2.5, 95% CI 1.3-4.7, p=0.005) predicted for an increased risk of LF. The cumulative incidence of VCF was 7.1% at 1 year and 12.3% at 2 years. Seven patients (6.3%) developed peripheral nerve toxicity, of which 4/7 had been previously radiated. ConclusionsSacral SBRT is associated with high efficacy rates and an acceptable toxicity profile. Adhering to consensus guidelines for target volume delineation is recommended to reduce the risk of LF.