Abstract

The topical literature lacks any comparison between stereolithography (SLA) and direct light processing (DLP) printing methods with regard to the accuracy of complete denture base fabrication, thereby utilizing materials certified for this purpose. In order to investigate this aspect, 15 denture bases were printed with SLA and DLP methods using three build angles: 0°, 45° and 90°. The dentures were digitalized using a laboratory scanner (D2000, 3Shape) and analyzed in analyzing software (Geomagic Control X, 3D systems). Differences between 3D datasets were measured using the root mean square (RMS) value for trueness and precision and mean and maximum deviations were obtained for each denture base. The data were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test. A heat map was generated to display the locations of the deviations within the intaglio surface. The overall tendency indicated that SLA denture bases had significantly higher trueness for most build angles compared to DLP (p < 0.001). The 90° build angle may provide the best trueness for both SLA and DLP. With regard to precision, statistically significant differences were found in the build angles only. Higher precision was revealed in the DLP angle of 0° in comparison to the 45° and 90° angles.

Highlights

  • With extensive applications of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) in modern clinical dentistry, various additive manufacturing (AM) methods have become available for the fabrication of surgical guides, dental models, provisional crowns and complete dentures [1,2,3]

  • The overall tendency indicated that SLA denture bases had significantly higher trueness for most build angles compared to direct light processing (DLP) (p < 0.001), confirmed by Tukey’s multiple comparison tests

  • The accuracy analysis in the present study revealed greater trueness for SLA comThe accuracy analysis in the present study revealed greater trueness for SLA compared pared to DLP

Read more

Summary

Introduction

With extensive applications of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) in modern clinical dentistry, various additive manufacturing (AM) methods have become available for the fabrication of surgical guides, dental models, provisional crowns and complete dentures [1,2,3]. A large number of clinical and technical protocols has been introduced to fabricate a complete denture in a fully digital workflow. In a clinical study by Cristache et al, patients’ high levels of satisfaction with digitally produced dentures were recorded in a follow-up after 18 months [7]. The fabrication of complete dentures using AM can be considered as a promising technique with regard to its clinical and technical performance [8,9]. It was reported that additively produced denture bases show a comparable tissue adaptation to milled ones [10]

Objectives
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call