Stereoelectroencephalography-Guided Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation of Epileptic Foci in the Eloquent Motor Cortex: Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy

Abstract

To assess safety and long-term outcome of stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG)-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFTC) of epileptic foci in eloquent motor areas. We retrospectively reviewed medical charts and surgical features of 15 patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy in eloquent motor areas treated between 2017 and 2021. All patients underwent SEEG-guided RFTC as the first option. General characteristics, SEEG findings, morbidity, and seizure outcome after RFTC were analyzed to extract the potential value of SEEG-guided RFTC for epileptic foci in eloquent motor areas. There were 12 male and 3 female patients. Mean age at RFTC was 25 ± 8.5 years (range, 14-48 years), and mean duration of epilepsy before SEEG was 9.5 ± 7.0 years (range, 2-26 years). Mean follow-up period was 22.1 months (range, 8-41 months). Magnetic resonance imaging findings were negative in 2 cases, suspected focal cortical dysplasia in 10 cases, central region band heterotopias in 2 cases, and malformations of cortical development in 1 case. RFTC sites included primary precentral area (M1) (7, 46.7%), paracentral lobule (4, 26.7%), supplemental motor area (2, 13.3%), and premotor area (2, 13.3%). Of 15 patients, 12 (80%) experienced a ≥75% decrease in seizure frequency, of whom 9 (60%) experienced a long-term seizure-free period (10-29 months, mean 21.3 months). Three (20%) patients did not benefit from RFTC. Nine patients had neurological deficits immediately after RFTC (transient in 8 patients [3 days to 3 weeks] and prolonged in 1 patient). SEEG-guided RFTC for epileptic foci in eloquent motor areas seems to be a safe and effective procedure. It could be the first option for drug-resistant epilepsy that is not amenable to surgical resection, especially for extremally focused epileptic foci in the cortex close to or inside the central region. Larger series and prospective studies are necessary to validate our conclusions.