Abstract

BackgroundAlthough arthroscopic anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) repair for chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI) has been widely performed, there are several issues such as the efficacy of the isolated ATFL repair for the ATFL and calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) injury and the influence of the poor remnant on the clinical outcomes to be discussed. This study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes of the arthroscopic ATFL repair with the stepwise decision regarding the requirement of CFL repair and the influence of remnant qualities on clinical outcomes. MethodsForty-four ankles underwent arthroscopic surgery to repair the lateral ankle ligament for CLAI. After arthroscopic ATFL repair, CFL repair was performed if instability remained. Clinical outcomes including the Karlsson-Peterson (KP) scores, Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot (JSSF) scale, and the Self-Administered Foot Evaluation Questionnaire (SAFE-Q) were assessed at the final follow-up. ATFL remnants were classified into excellent, moderate, and poor according to the arthroscopic findings, and the clinical outcomes of each remnant group were compared. ResultsTwenty-five ankles were required for CFL repair after ATFL repair. K–P score was significantly improved from 66.1 ± 5.3 to 94.8 ± 6.5 points (p < 0.01). JSSF scale was significantly improved from 70.5 ± 4.5 to 95.9 ± 6.0 points (p < 0.01). The SAFE-Q was also significantly improved on all subscales. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes among excellent, moderate, and poor remnants. ConclusionsStepwise decision for CFL repair in addition to arthroscopic ATFL repair gave satisfactory clinical outcomes in CLAI regardless of the remnant quality.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.