Abstract

In many animal species, widowed or divorced parents may remate before young of the prior union are independent. In such circumstances, stepparents may kill their predecessors' offspring, may tolerate them without providing care, or may invest in them more or less as genetic parents do. Rohwer proposed that all three of these responses may be understood as mating tactics, adapted to different social and ecological circumstances. We discuss the selection pressures that would favor each of these alternatives and review relevant evidence on nonhuman stepparenting, especially in birds. Stepparental tolerance and (partial or full) care, which are the predominant human responses, are common in nonhuman animals too, and in many cases there is evidence supporting their interpretation as stepparental mating effort adaptations. In general, however, this interpretation is not as well established for tolerance and care as it is for stepparental infanticide. Because tolerance and care are not distinct modes of behavior peculiar to stepparents, the hypothesis that they are nonadaptive by-products of parental psychology often remains tenable. We discuss the kinds of evidence needed to choose between by-product and stepparental adaptation hypotheses.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.