Abstract

This study aimed to compare stent graft with balloon tamponade for ruptured dialysis access during percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Patients over an 8-year period (2010–2018) were identified from a database of 11,609 procedures. The primary endpoint was target lesion primary patency at 12 months. A total of 143 patients who had rupture dialysis access were enrolled, of whom 52 were salvaged by stent grafts and 91 were salvaged by balloon tamponade. The 6-month target lesion primary patency was greater in the stent graft group than in the balloon tamponade group (66.7% vs. 29.5%, P < 0.001). The benefit of stent grafts was sustained for 12 months (52.5% vs. 9.0%, P < 0.001). The stent grafts increased the median time from the index procedure to the next intervention in the ruptured area by 171 days (260 vs. 89 days) at 12 months. There was no significant difference in the access circuit patency rates at 6 months (25.5% vs. 19.8%, P = 0.203) and 12 months (12.0% vs. 5.8%, P = 0.052). The patency results of the stent grafts remained after the multivariable adjustment analysis. Compared to balloon tamponade alone, stent grafts provided superior target lesion primary patency at 6 and 12 months. The access circuit patency rates were similar.

Highlights

  • This study aimed to compare stent graft with balloon tamponade for ruptured dialysis access during percutaneous transluminal angioplasty

  • percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA)-related venous rupture is usually salvaged by balloon tamponade (BT), followed by stent placement for uncontrolled bleeding

  • The use of SG to seal ruptured dialysis vascular access has been reported in sporadic c­ ases[8,9]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This study aimed to compare stent graft with balloon tamponade for ruptured dialysis access during percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. The 6-month target lesion primary patency was greater in the stent graft group than in the balloon tamponade group (66.7% vs 29.5%, P < 0.001). Compared to balloon tamponade alone, stent grafts provided superior target lesion primary patency at 6 and 12 months. The patency of ruptured vessels is poor, ranging from 20 to 40% only, even when bare-metal stents are ­used[2,4,5,6] This patency rate is well below the reasonable goal of patency at 6 months stated in the international guidelines for vascular a­ ccess[1,7]. We aimed to evaluate the immediate and long-term patency outcomes of SGs compared to BT in treating vessel ruptures induced by PTA of dialysis vascular accesses

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call