Abstract

AbstractTo investigate C and N rhizodeposition, plants can be 13C‐15N double‐labeled with glucose and urea using a stem‐feeding method (wick method). However, it is unclear how the 13C applied as glucose is released into the soil as rhizorespiration in comparison with the 13C applied as CO2 using a natural uptake pathway. In the present study, we therefore compared the short‐term fate of 14C and 15N in white lupine and pea plants applied either by the wick method or the natural pathways of C and N assimilation. Plants were pulse‐labeled in 14CO2‐enriched atmosphere and 15N urea was applied to the roots (atmosphere–soil) following the natural assimilation pathways, or plants were simultaneously labeled with 14C and 15N by applying a 14C glucose–15N urea solution into the stem using the wick method. Plant development, soil microbial biomass, total rhizorespiration, and distribution of N in plants were not affected by the labeling method used but by plant species. However, the 15N : N ratio in plant parts was significantly (p < 0.05) affected by the labeling method, indicating more homogeneous 15N enrichment of plants labeled via root uptake. After 14CO2 atmosphere labeling of plants, the cumulated 14CO2 release from roots and soil showed the common saturation dynamics. In contrast, after 14C‐glucose labeling by the wick method, the cumulated 14CO2 release increased linearly. These results show that 14C applied as glucose using the wick method is not rapidly transferred to the roots as compared to a short‐term 14CO2 pulse. This is partly due to a slower 14C uptake and partly due to slow distribution within the plant. Consequently, 14C‐glucose application by the wick method is no pulse‐labeling approach. However, the advantages of the wick method for 13C‐15N double labeling for estimating rhizodeposition especially under field conditions requires further methodological research.

Highlights

  • Belowground C and N of legumes are significant quantitative pools of the plant-derived residue C and N contributing to C sequestration as well as to N nutrition in crop rotations (Mayer et al, 2003; Jones et al, 2009; Yasmin et al, 2010)

  • Neither atmospheric 14CO2 labeling of plants and 15N-urea application in the root system, nor stem feeding plants with a 14C glucose–15N urea solution using the wick method had any effect on total plant and root dry matter (Tab. 1)

  • The two methods applied for labeling plants with 14C and 15N showed no effect on plant growth and soil microbial biomass

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Belowground C and N of legumes are significant quantitative pools of the plant-derived residue C and N contributing to C sequestration as well as to N nutrition in crop rotations (Mayer et al, 2003; Jones et al, 2009; Yasmin et al, 2010). Our understanding of their contribution to the dynamics of microbially driven soil processes and nutrition of subsequent crops is limited (Jones et al, 2009; Yasmin et al, 2010). Besides the fact that research on N rhizodeposition is still scarce (Jones et al, 2009), one possible reason for this high variability is the use of different methods for labeling plants with 15N and varying experimental conditions

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call