Abstract

The ancient world saw the rise and fall of many cultures, with accompanying cultural exchanges and reciprocal influences. It seems that such reciprocal influences and exchanges extended to the law as well, and affected legal evolution. Old legal institutions were preserved for future generations but were influenced by newer cultures. This concept is not new, but Barta has revived it. He has embarked on a publication comprising four volumes, of which volumes 1, 2 (pt1/2) and 3 (pt 1) have appeared. The author has set out to prove that the influence of Greek law on Roman law was greater than has been acknowledged up until now, that Greek law was likewise influenced by the Old Orient, and that Roman law also influenced later legal systems. The one concern of this article is to show that Barta's theory is invalid. The other concern is to criticise Barta's approach. He does not cite the extensive literature on which he relies, but quotes it. He fills page after page with texts by other authors but does not discuss nor analyse their content. Thus the reader is provided with a wide range of legal literature of the past, but not with any critical analysis of it. Newer writing is often neglected. Barta himself has interesting ideas, but it is difficult to detect them, hidden as they are amongst the cited literature. This approach is followed in all volumes but is scientifically unacceptable and merits the strongest criticism.

Highlights

  • Nun könnte man freilich einwenden, daß die Belege zum ägyptischen Rechtsalltag der Pharaonenzeit von einer gelebten „Ma’at“ nichts erkennen lassen, aber das ist für philophische Gedanken der Normalfall, und falls für Solons Denken altägyptische Vorbilder in Betracht kämen, so entstammten diese keinesfalls dem Alltag

  • The ancient world saw the rise and fall of many cultures, with accompanying cultural exchanges and reciprocal influences. It seems that such reciprocal influences and exchanges extended to the law as well, and affected legal evolution

  • Old legal institutions were preserved for future generations but were influenced by newer cultures

Read more

Summary

Joachim Hengstl*

Betrachtet man das Entstehen, Blühen und Vergehen antiker Kulturen, deren Kontakte untereinander und den damit verbundenen kulturellen Austausch sowie die Vielfalt der wechselseitigen Einflüsse, so drängt sich unter juristischem. Blickwinkel schnell der Eindruck auf, daß an diesem Wechselspiel auch das Recht teilgenommen haben muß. Das Bild eines fließenden und wachsenden Stroms rechtlicher Entwicklung, tradiert von Epoche zu Epoche, über die Kulturgrenzen und über die Zeiten hinweg, vielleicht bis heute wirkend, ist ebenso eindruckvoll wie überwältigend. Der Gedanke einer zusammenhängenden Geschichte wenigstens der antiken Rechtsordnungen ist nicht neu. Vor allem L Wenger hat diese These entwickelt, bereits in seiner Wiener Antrittsvorlesung 1904, „Römische und antike.

Joachim Hengstl
Vor dem Hintergrund der weiteren Ausführungen fällt bereits in diesem
Geschichte des griechischen Rechts noch eine Geschichte der griechischen
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call