Abstract

Digital Twins are conceptualised in the academic technical discourse as real-time realistic digital representations of physical entities. Originating from product engineering, the Digital Twin quickly advanced into other fields, including the life sciences and earth sciences. Digital Twins are seen by the tech sector as the new promising tool for efficiency and optimisation, while governmental agencies see it as a fruitful means for improving decision-making to meet sustainability goals. A striking example of the latter is the European Commission who wishes to delegate a significant role to Digital Twins in addressing climate change and supporting Green Deal policy. As Digital Twins give rise to high expectations, ambitions, and are being entrusted important societal roles, it is crucial to critically reflect on the nature of Digital Twins. In this article, we therefore philosophically reflect on Digital Twins by critically analysing dominant conceptualisations, the assumptions underlying them, and their normative implications. We dissect the concept and argue that a Digital Twin does not merely fulfil the role of being a representation, but is in fact a steering technique used to direct a physical entity towards certain goals by means of multiple representations. Currently, this steering seems mainly fuelled by a reductionist approach focused on efficiency and optimisation. However, this is not the only direction from which a Digital Twin can be thought and, consequently, designed and deployed. We therefore set an agenda based on a critical understanding of Digital Twins that helps to draw out their beneficial potential, while addressing their potential issues.

Highlights

  • While the technical discourse frames the digital representations in terms of being “realistic” and “complete”, it is the difference between the physical entity and its digital counterpart that makes the representations valuable

  • The notion “twin” transfers a relation of sameness as well as a relation of equality to the Digital Twin

  • It is precisely on these points that the ambiguity of the Digital Twin conceptualisations is the most critical: the digital representation is a translated surplus that is necessarily different from the physical entity, and by substituting the physical entity it takes in a dominant and steering position

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Because no specific technology can be pointed out as the baseline for what identifies as a Digital Twin (Liu et al, 2020), we will focus our attention on Digital Twin conceptualisations in the contemporary technical academic discourse. Digital Twins are increasingly used to represent not just products or objects, but living entities from the level of individual organisms to whole ecosystems As such, they become a new means to generate knowledge in the life sciences and earth sciences and to manage and steer environmental challenges. In current understandings of Digital Twins in the technical academic discourse, this steering seems mainly fuelled by a reductionist approach focused on efficiency and optimisation.

Digital Twin Conceptualisations
Interrogating Digital Twin Conceptualisations
A Datafied Surplus
Unrealistic Descriptive Ambitions
Incomplete
Norm Reversal
A Digital Substitute
Affecting Relations
Shaping Potentiality
A Steering Technique
Techno‐industrial Tendencies
Conclusion
A Digital Twin is a technique for agents to steer a physical entity
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call