Abstract
Abstract This most recent litigation between the Steel Hill Development Corporation and the Town of Sanbornton is indeed remarkable.1 It portrays an ineptness on the part of developer's counsel equalled only by the audacity of a town which thinks it can forever ward off the Twentieth Century by the misuse of police power. In this undistinguished company, the court quickly shows it is at home by failing to reach the merits of the case asserting, after plaintiff's presentation, that the doctrine of collateral estoppel bars it from reexamining the validity of three acre minimum lot sue zoning.2
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
