Abstract

BackgroundSteatotic liver disease (SLD) has emerged as new nomenclature to increase awareness and reflect the pathophysiology of the disease better. We investigated the risk of advanced fibrosis and cardiovascular disease (CVD) in SLD using data derived from a Korean prospective cohort. MethodsWe defined SLD using the fatty liver index (FLI) and identified advanced fibrosis with the age-adjusted Fibrosis-4 Index. SLD was further subcategorized into metabolic dysfunction-associated SLD (MASLD), MASLD with increased alcohol intake (MetALD), and alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD). FindingsThe Ansung–Ansan cohort of the Korean Genome and Epidemiology study, following 9497 participants from 2002 to 2020, included 3642 (38.3%) with MASLD, 424 (4.5%) with MetALD, and 207 (2.1%) with ALD. During the median follow-up of 17.5 years, CVD risk was higher in those with MASLD (hazard ratio [HR], 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12–1.45; P < 0.001), MetALD (HR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.33–2.65; P < 0.001), and ALD (HR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.01–3.77; P < 0.001) than in those without SLD, after adjusting for conventional risk factors. Notably, CVD risk was higher in the MetALD than in the MASLD group (P = 0.027). In the MASLD group, the number of cardiometabolic risk factors (CMRFs) correlated positively with CVD risk (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.24–1.45; P < 0.001 for trend). Among the CMRFs, hypertension (HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.63–2.31; P < 0.001) was the predominant contributor to CVD. The MASLD (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.25–1.55; P < 0.001), MetALD (HR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.38–2.23; P < 0.001), and ALD (HR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.30–3.07; P = 0.002) groups had a higher risk of advanced fibrosis than did the non-SLD group (P < 0.001 for trend). InterpretationOur study provides new insight into hepatic and cardiovascular outcomes related to SLD subtypes. The risk of CVD increased in the order of no SLD, MASLD, and MetALD. The SLD subcategories, considering CMRFs and alcohol intake, outperformed traditional fatty liver categorizations in predicting CVD risk. The proposed SLD terminology could impact clinical practice, warranting further exploration of the heterogeneity of clinical outcomes among SLD subtypes.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.