Abstract

FeCrAl and Zircaloy cladding tubes are vertically placed in the saturated pool boiling chamber to perform steady-state and power-transient critical heat flux (CHF) experiments. Three FeCrAl-variants, including FeCrAl-C26M, FeCrAl-B126Y, and FeCrAl-B136Y, are tested to compare their pool boiling thermal performances with traditional Zircaloy claddings including Zirlo, Zr705, and Zircaloy-4. In the steady-state pool boiling experiments, it was confirmed that FeCrAl alloys have higher pool boiling CHF values than Zircaloys. Among these tested materials, FeCrAl-C26M has the highest pool boiling CHF, but the FeCrAl-C26M nucleate boiling heat transfer coefficient is less than that of FeCrAl-B136Y. It reconfirms that CHF is enhanced on the post-CHF oxidized samples. However, as the cycling number of post-CHF oxidization increases, the CHF enhancement becomes less appreciable due to the limited physics contributions of the oxide layer. It is noteworthy that the finalized CHF enhancement can vary a lot between different cladding materials. For example, in three Zircaloy variants, their saturated pool boiling CHF results converge to 980 kW/m2 on the post-CHF oxidized samples. In three FeCrAl variants, their pool boiling CHF results are finalized to 1400 kW/m2. This CHF enhancement difference could be possibly attributed to the chemical constituents of oxide layers presented on cladding surfaces. The Fuchs-reactivity initiated accident transients are simulated by direct current programmable power supply to characterize thermal responses of different claddings to various pulse-width power transients. It is found that the heat transfer coefficients show monotonically increasing parametric trend with respect to faster power-transient rates, i.e., shorter pulse widths. Different from the steady-state pool boiling, the transition boiling regime is phenomenologically reflected in the power-transient pool boiling curve. This potentially implies that power-transient CHF featured by surface temperature overshoot may indicate transient thermal-safety margins not so accurately as the power-transient maximum heat flux. The difference gap of power-transient maximum heat flux between various cladding materials can be gradually closed by the progressive increasing of power transient rates.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call