Abstract

FeCrAl and Zircaloy cladding tubes are vertically placed in the saturated pool boiling chamber to perform steady-state and power-transient critical heat flux (CHF) experiments. Three FeCrAl-variants, including FeCrAl-C26M, FeCrAl-B126Y, and FeCrAl-B136Y, are tested to compare their pool boiling thermal performances with traditional Zircaloy claddings including Zirlo, Zr705, and Zircaloy-4. In the steady-state pool boiling experiments, it was confirmed that FeCrAl alloys have higher pool boiling CHF values than Zircaloys. Among these tested materials, FeCrAl-C26M has the highest pool boiling CHF, but the FeCrAl-C26M nucleate boiling heat transfer coefficient is less than that of FeCrAl-B136Y. It reconfirms that CHF is enhanced on the post-CHF oxidized samples. However, as the cycling number of post-CHF oxidization increases, the CHF enhancement becomes less appreciable due to the limited physics contributions of the oxide layer. It is noteworthy that the finalized CHF enhancement can vary a lot between different cladding materials. For example, in three Zircaloy variants, their saturated pool boiling CHF results converge to 980 kW/m2 on the post-CHF oxidized samples. In three FeCrAl variants, their pool boiling CHF results are finalized to 1400 kW/m2. This CHF enhancement difference could be possibly attributed to the chemical constituents of oxide layers presented on cladding surfaces. The Fuchs-reactivity initiated accident transients are simulated by direct current programmable power supply to characterize thermal responses of different claddings to various pulse-width power transients. It is found that the heat transfer coefficients show monotonically increasing parametric trend with respect to faster power-transient rates, i.e., shorter pulse widths. Different from the steady-state pool boiling, the transition boiling regime is phenomenologically reflected in the power-transient pool boiling curve. This potentially implies that power-transient CHF featured by surface temperature overshoot may indicate transient thermal-safety margins not so accurately as the power-transient maximum heat flux. The difference gap of power-transient maximum heat flux between various cladding materials can be gradually closed by the progressive increasing of power transient rates.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.