Abstract

To the Editor.— I am grateful to Dr Cates 1 for calling attention to my ideas. 2,3 Dr Cates says, data support the assertion that relatively small financial incentives may influence the vicissitudes of sexual decision making and/ or behavior. But he presents no data that refute what is, if nothing else, a sound economic presumption. Patients with venereal disease are not stupid. They know that condoms cost them money but treatment is free so therefore it's economically irrational to buy condoms, and they don't. If we establish economically irrational policies then we're irrational, too. No one should be surprised if they fail. Dr Cates says it's cheaper for the public to treat sexually transmitted diseases earlier than later. I'm sure he's right. But his argument can be made for every treatable illness or injury: breast cancer, for example, or diabetic retinopathy. People with serious conditions may eventually become

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call