Abstract

Introduction: Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have a large percentage of globalmortality and morbidity rates from non-communicable diseases, including trauma. Theestablishment and development of emergency care systems is crucial for addressing thisproblem. Defining gaps in the resources and capacity to provide emergency healthcare in LMICsis essential for proper design and operation of ECS (emergency care services) reinforcementprograms. Myanmar has particular challenges with road access for providing timely emergencymedical care, and a shortage of trained health workers. To examine the ECS capacity in Myanmar,we used the Emergency Care Assessment Tool (ECAT), which features newly developed toolsfor assessing sentinel conditions and signal functions (key interventions to address morbidity andmortality) in emergency care facilities.Methods: ECAT is composed of six emergent sentinel conditions and corresponding signalfunctions. We surveyed a total of nine hospitals in five states in Myanmar. A constructed surveysheet was delivered by e-mail, and follow-up interviews were conducted via messenger to clarifyambiguous answers.Results: We categorized the nine participating institutions according to predefined criteria:four basic-level hospitals; four intermediate-level; and one advanced-level hospital. All basichospitals were weak in trauma care, and two of 12 signal functions were unavailable. Half of theintermediate hospitals showed weakness in trauma care, as well as critical care such as shockmanagement. Only half had a separate triage area for patients. In contrast, all signal functions andresources listed in ECAT were available in the advanced-level hospital.Conclusion: Basic-level facilities in Myanmar were shown to be suboptimal in traumamanagement, with critical care also inadequate in intermediate facilities. To reinforce signalfunctions in Myanmar health facilities, stakeholders should consider expanding critical functionsin selected lower-level health facilities. A larger scale survey would provide more comprehensivedata to improve emergency care in Myanmar.

Highlights

  • Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have a large percentage of global mortality and morbidity rates from non-communicable diseases, including trauma

  • Basic-level facilities in Myanmar were shown to be suboptimal in trauma management, with critical care inadequate in intermediate facilities

  • The remaining questions addressed the performance of emergency signal functions, the products for signal functions, and the availability of emergency facility infrastructures

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have a large percentage of global mortality and morbidity rates from non-communicable diseases, including trauma. Defining gaps in the resources and capacity to provide emergency healthcare in LMICs is essential for proper design and operation of ECS (emergency care services) reinforcement programs. Strengthening medical systems by improving the standard of emergency care has been known to reduce the mortality and morbidity from both communicable and non-communicable diseases.[4,5] A large proportion of the global mortality and morbidity rate from various diseases is found in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The emergency care systems required to address these shortcomings are not well established in most LMICs, including Myanmar.[6] Formal emergency care in Myanmar is only available in hospitals located in urban areas. Rural hospitals can provide only limited emergency care to patients.[7]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call