Abstract

Linguistic evolution mirrors cultural evolution, of which one of the most decisive steps was the "agricultural revolution" that occurred 11,000 years ago in W. Asia. Traditional comparative historical linguistics becomes inaccurate for time depths greater than, say, 10 kyr. Therefore it is difficult to determine whether decisive events in human prehistory have had an observable impact on human language. Here we supplement the traditional methodology with independent statistical measures showing that following the transition to agriculture, languages of W. Asia underwent a transition from biconsonantal (2c) to triconsonantal (3c) morphology. Two independent proofs for this are provided. Firstly the reconstructed Proto-Semitic fire and hunting lexicons are predominantly 2c, whereas the farming lexicon is almost exclusively 3c in structure. Secondly, while Biblical verbs show the usual Zipf exponent of about 1, their 2c subset exhibits a larger exponent. After the 2c > 3c transition, this could arise from a faster decay in the frequency of use of the less common 2c verbs. Using an established frequency-dependent word replacement rate, we calculate that the observed increase in the Zipf exponent has occurred over the 7,500 years predating Biblical Hebrew namely, starting with the transition to agriculture.

Highlights

  • In most of its history, homo-sapiens sapiens followed the hunter-gatherer way of life

  • We find that the end of the 2c era has occurred ca. 7.8 kyr before Biblical Hebrew (BH) [30,31,32], and this corresponds rather nicely to the onset of agriculture

  • Details and discussions of all reconstructions are given in the Etymological Appendix (EA) compiled by Yigal Bloch (Text S3), which is in general agreement with earlier work [8]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In most of its history, homo-sapiens sapiens followed the hunter-gatherer way of life. Between 15,000 and 10,000 years ago, a major transition in human sustenance was instigated in W. Asia, which set the stage for modern human society: the transition to agriculture [1]. This included domestication of plants and mammals [2], sedentism and the establishment of the large Neolithic villages [3]. An important factor allowing the concomitant enhancement in social complexity was the ability to communicate. Was language influenced by this decisive step in human prehistory? Most of the historical linguistic literature does not explicitly relate to this intriguing question Was language influenced by this decisive step in human prehistory? Most of the historical linguistic literature does not explicitly relate to this intriguing question

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call