Abstract

Despite improvement over the last decade, inadequate method verification strategies and documentation are still common laboratory inspection deficiencies. Some of the gaps occur because microbiologists may not use scientific experiment concepts, such as experimental design, data validation, biostatistics, and electronic documentation, that can improve their verification strategies for new test methods. Other gaps occur because laboratory resources are often limited. Clinical laboratories face tough choices when they consider implementing a new test method, and this review summarizes the basic statistical concepts that microbiologists need to critically plan and review qualitative method verification with the aim of determining whether a new diagnostic test is fit for patient testing.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.