Abstract
In this paper three different methods were used for plutonium separation and statistical tested-molecular recognition technology products AnaLig® Pu-02, liquid–liquid extraction with Aliquat-336 and extraction chromatography with TRU® Resin. The methods performance was investigated by analysis of NPL (High Alpha–Beta 2005) intercomparison sample. Regression diagnostics procedures were used for examination of the regression triplet and pair t test were applied for comparison of methods for the separation of 239,240Pu, 238Pu with Aliquat-336, TRU® Resin and AnaLig® Pu-02. The presented results were evaluated as correct for all experimental data.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
