Abstract

We compare the current statistical methods applied to short-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments looking for light sterile neutrinos. The interpretation of the reconstructed confidence regions differs because of the different definition of the alternative hypothesis in the hypothesis test. When the alternative hypothesis extends over the whole physical allowed parameter space of the oscillation parameters, proper confidence regions are obtained both in case of a limit and a signal. Since the different definition of the alternative hypothesis prevents from a direct comparison of the results, a standardized analysis is proposed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.