Abstract

This paper considers the problem of choosing the sample size for testing hypotheses on the parameters of a model using Bayes factors. Extending the evidential approach outlined in Royall (Statistical Evidence: a Likelihood paradigm. Chapman & Hall, London (1997), J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 95 (2000) 760) to the Bayesian framework, the predictive criterion proposed for determining the sample size is maximizing the probability of obtaining substantial evidence in favor of the true hypotheses, i.e. minimizing the probabilities of having either misleading or weak evidence. The method is developed for the normal model in several testing problems that arise, for instance, when comparing treatments in clinical trials.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.