Statistical evaluation of potential mistakes and malpractice in a Chest Pain Unit

Abstract

The Chest Pain Unit (CPU) of Policlinico Umberto I, established in 2008, is charged with the management of patients with non-traumatic chest pain transferred from the Emergency Department and aims at: a) an early recognition of patients at high risk of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), in order to perform a primary PCI within 90 minutes; b) an early diagnosis of patients at low risk of ACS in order to discharge them in a short time, and c) the diagnostic performance of clinical tests in patients at intermediate risk of ACS in order to identify those who require either a new PCI or a coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). The purpose is to avoid malpractice which could even imply the risk of legal conflicts. We evaluated the total number of admissions to the Emergency Department of Policlinico Umberto I in the period 2010-2011 and selected the patients with non-traumatic chest pain and acute coronary syndrome. In the Chest Pain Unit, patients with non-traumatic chest pain or ACS were recruited through a) the use of the Chest Pain Score to define the typicality or atypicality of chest pain; b) the stratification of the risk of ACS using the modified Braunwald Score; and c) the stratification of patients at intermediate or high risk of ACS using the GRACE ACS Model in order to perform a PCI. In the period 2010-2011, 603 patients were admitted to the CPU with non-traumatic chest pain. Of them, 15.75% (95) were diagnosed with atypical chest pain; 27.03% (163) with chronic stable angina pectoris; 9.3% (56) received a diagnosis of chronic heart failure and 47.92% (289) suffered from non ischemic cardiovascular disease. Other 124 subjects were admitted to the CPU with a diagnosis of ACS, but only in 91.93% of the cases such diagnosis was confirmed, whereas for the remaining 8.06% was discarded. On the whole, 54.2% (394) of the 727 patients admitted to the CPU with non-traumatic chest pain and acute coronary syndrome showed a low cardiovascular risk; 30.12% (219) were at intermediate risk and 15.68% (144) at high risk. The aim of the CPU is to accomplish a selection of the subjects at high risk of ACS, to drastically reduce the time of diagnosis and treatment to 24-36 hours and to avoid possible mistakes or adverse events by using both unsophisticated diagnostic tests and a personalized management of diagnosis and treatment.