Abstract
The conclusion drawn in a recent paper by Minton and associates (Cancer 1983; 51:1249-1253), that caffeine and an unsaturated fat diet significantly promoted dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA)-induced breast cancer in rats, is based on fallacious statistical reasoning. Minton and associates based their conclusion on the mean latency to first tumor appearance for rats diagnosed with tumors. However, evaluation of percentages of tumor-bearing rats yields contrary results. Using data from a totally negative hypothetical two-group experiment, we demonstrate how such "conflicting" results could arise from differential intercurrent mortality in the two groups. The correct statistical analysis of this hypothetical experiment allows for differential intercurrent mortality and no conflict arises; the data of Minton and associates need to be analyzed by these methods.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
