Abstract

This paper is concerned with the assessment of the statistical efficiency of proposed regenerative simulation methods. We compare the efficiency of the ‘marked job' and ‘labelled jobs' methods for estimation of passage times in multiclass networks of queues with general service times. Using central limit theorem arguments, we show that the confidence intervals constructed for the expected value of a general function of the limiting passage time using the labelled jobs method are shorter than those obtained from the marked job method. This is consistent with intuition since the labelled jobs method extracts more passage-time information from a fixed-length simulation run.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.